BARBARA'S TCHATZKAHS

This speaks for itself! From HEIDI LI'S POTPOURRI Watch the video here . Listen to The New Agenda's executive director Amy Siskind succeed as she raises pertinent, relatively mild objections, to the Ms. Magazine cover for its special inauguration issue. Then listen to Ms. Magazine's executive editor Katherine Spillar as she first a) dodges the issue, which is not whether men can be feminists, but whether there is any basis for referring to this man, President-elect Obama, as "what a feminist looks like" and then b) tells people to read the magazine so as to understand the cover (read = buy the magazine) and then c) evidently indicated to the CNN anchors that subscriptions to the magazine are up because of the inauguration cover, and thus the cover was a good idea. Successful covers do not require a magazine to explain or justify their meaning. For example, most thoughtful criticisms of The New Yorker's satirical cover of the Obamas faulted the cover for being...

Breathe. Breathe. Go to your happy place. I am sorry but the cognitive dissonance just gave me a migraine. I can't take it one. more. second. I have HAD IT with Michelle Obama being splashed on magazines as a STYLE DIVA and how she shops at the Gap like all us "normal folk." Riiiiiggghhhttt... the woman looks like a pre-op tranny. Oh, she's the marital advice person now... Oprah might give her a Dr. Phil show huh? The perfect wife!! Are you KIDDING ME? She's just a college degree away from being a thug. And now this. The supposed "feminists" just bend right over for Obama. He's a feminist? After the way he treated HILLARY? After the way his people treated HILLARY and every other woman around him that wasn't worshipping at his altar. How far up their derriere's did these people have to put their heads to actually print this stuff as if it was anywhere CLOSE to the truth? Just look at the latest cover of the magazine. Start writing ...