Standing By Your Sex-Hobbyist -Man; Because It's Your Fault Too?

TWISTED ISLAMOFASCIST MISOGYNY

“Women in some cultures are not averse to beatings, Allah permits it”. Well then, I think Allah needs feel some high heels in his privates. NOT AVERSE TO BEATINGS? Even animals don't like beatings and will turn on people who beat them. Women in Islamofascist-think are just supposed to churn out babies so these creeps can strap bombs to them and send them to kill Jews. If this is true, then Allah is a child-abuser, a woman-abuser and an IDIOT.

The Quran, the Final Testament, said more than 1400 years ago, in verse 4:34.

[4:34] The men are made responsible for the women, and GOD has endowed them with certain qualities, and made them the bread earners. The righteous women will cheerfully accept this arrangement, since it is GOD's commandment, and honor their husbands during their absence. If you experience rebellion from the women, you shall first talk to them, then (you may use negative incentives like) deserting them in bed, then you may (as a last alternative) beat them. If they obey you, you are not permitted to transgress against them. GOD is Most High, Supreme.

But as we all know, these Jihadi-obsessed people can't walk and talk at the same time. VERBAL ABUSE IS STILL ABUSE NO MATTER HOW SUBTLE.

Blair and Cameron's inter-faith dialogue
Posted by Damian Thompson

This week, Tony Blair and David Cameron will meet Muslim leaders including the Grand Mufti of Egypt, Sheikh Ali Gomaa, at an inter-faith dialogue at Cambridge University.

I wonder if they will “dialogue” about the question of wife-beating, on which Gomaa apparently has some interesting views. “Women in some cultures are not averse to beatings,” he has been quoted as saying in a television interview in 2006. Indeed, “Allah permits it”.

The conference will hear a video message from the Prince of Wales, whose interest in Islam seems to be growing by the day. How embarrassing, then, that the American website Jihadwatch has posted a link to what appears to be a genuine interview uncovered by the Middle East Media Research Institute. I’m going to post the extracts in full, and let you work out for yourselves what Sheikh Gomaa was saying.

Ali Gomaa: Wife-beating is associated with the cultural status of women in the different societies. Women in some cultures are not averse to beatings. They consider it as an expression of masculinity, and as a kind of control, which she herself desires. In other societies, it is the exact opposite. We must follow reason. When we are dealing with certain societies...

I got a question from Canada. The man said: “Here, it is a crime to beat a wife, even with a toothbrush. Is this prohibition acceptable in Islam? Yes. Islam accepts that the beating of Canadian wives, in this culture and ambience... From childhood they are taught that beating women is a type of barbarism, savagery, and so on. There is nothing wrong with taking this into consideration, and adapting to society, because Islam did not command us to be aggressive towards women.

If in their culture, this constitutes aggression towards women, then we are forbidden to be aggressive towards women. In this situation it is inevitable but to consider [beating] this way, and accepting the society, because Islam did not come and command me to be aggressive towards women. But when Allah permitted wife-beating, He permitted it to the other side of culture, which considers it as one of the means to preserve the family, and as one of the means to preserve stability.

Was the Sheikh being taken out of context? Have his words been mistranslated or misunderstood? Well, there’s one easy way to find out.

Tony and Dave – which of you is going to ask him?

ORIGINAL BLOG POST HERE

ISLAM ON WIFE-BEATING


PLEASE CLICK HERE TO JBLOG ME