Cook's a Narcissist (Brinkley Divorce Trial)

Not just stupid, "needy" women get taken in by these guys. They are so pervasive -- they take in USUALLY the BEST OF US!!

Good for you Christie for keeping it public and letting people know these creeps are out there among us all... and don't worry about what Cook or any of his buddies say about you. You do what's best for your kids!

(excerpt:)

Christie Brinkley Divorce: Shrink Says Cook’s Brain Is All Weird

by Stuart Heritage

If you were the judge in the Christie Brinkley divorce, who would you give custody of the children to?

You’ve got two choices - there’s Christie Brinkley, the former supermodel who looks like she spends her weekends baking cooking and making fresh lemonade; and

then there’s Peter Cook, a man who pays thousands of dollars each month to waggle his pee-pee around on the internet.

You’d probably wait for professional psychiatric advice before making a decision, wouldn’t you? Well, fear not - a psychiatrist has taken the stand at the Christie Brinkley divorce, and he’s called Peter Cook an ‘insatiable narcissist’. Peter Cook would have denied this claim, but he was too busy tenderly licking his own reflection in a mirror to pay attention to anything that was being said at the time.

We’ve been doing our best to keep track of the Christie Brinkley divorce, we really have, but it’s been hard. This is partly because we don’t really care about Christie Brinkley, but mostly because the structure’s all out of whack.

Seriously, if your opening day argument is going to be about how Peter Cook spends $3,000 a month on internet pornography, then you’d better be able to top that on following days. Unless you’ve discovered that Peter Cook was once filmed having sex with an octopus or something, people are only going to focus on the porn thing. Or maybe that’s just us.

Anyway, what the Christie Brinkley divorce needed was a softly-spoken professional to cut through all the accusations with a precise assessment of exactly why you’ll forever be unable to shake Peter Cook’s hand without imagining him using it to thrash away at his middle-aged pecker in front of a pixelised image of a vagina he’s paid hundreds of dollars to see.

And yesterday that’s what it got, in the guise of Dr. Stephen Herman, a New York psychiatrist employed by the court to analyse Peter Cook, Christie Brinkley and their two children. Newsday reports:

“Mr. Cook is characterologically a narcissist,” said Dr. Stephen Herman. “While most people need a feeding for their egos, Mr. Cook has an insatiable appetite.” … Herman said Cook most likely endangered his children if they were exposed to his pornography or illicit relationships.

Endangered? Hah, he calls himself a psychiatrist? He knows nothing - there isn’t a man on the face of the planet who can’t say that he didn’t learn everything worth knowing about sex from the VHS copy of Murder On The Orient Sexpress that he found in a shoebox at the bottom of his Dad’s wardrobe when he was 12. That did happen to all men, right? Good, that’s what we thought.